Well...Tech ain't comin to norf dakota..BUT

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by KirbyTheAlmighty on September 14, 2009 at 2:56am

I must say.
I'm very sorry that those three will be in your state.

My condolences to you and your state.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Se7en01 on September 14, 2009 at 2:59am

haha..i'll def go for skat n snug...probably stay for mims too. see if i can gain some respect for the man.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by KirbyTheAlmighty on September 14, 2009 at 3:00am

I've never really liked Mims. I know a lot of people that really like his stuff.
His flow is too boring for me.

On the same note, I never really liked Skat and Snug, either.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Se7en01 on September 14, 2009 at 3:05am

for one...anytime a mainstream rapper comes to nd...ppl are gonna go.

i agree with you on mims. his flow is SHIT. the only reason i came to not mind him is that he apparently has an ear for good hip hop if he sought out tech to be on his cd. he probably having second thoughts on doing that cuz tech completely embarrased him in that song.

as for skat n snug...i've always liked them. maybe its because they were a change of pace while they were on strange music. i have respect for them still i guess.

KirbyTheAlmighty said:

I've never really liked Mims. I know a lot of people that really like his stuff.
His flow is too boring for me.

On the same note, I never really liked Skat and Snug, either.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by KirbyTheAlmighty on September 14, 2009 at 3:06am

Word. A lot of people do.
I could just never get into their music.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Se7en01 on September 14, 2009 at 3:08am

yeah i can understand that. i can get into it but its not as easy to relate to...seeing that i'm from nd and "we iznt gangsta enuf up hurr fer dat shit". still like em. they compliment each other well as a group. excited to hear some solo shit from both of them.

KirbyTheAlmighty said:

Word. A lot of people do.
I could just never get into their music.

• ▶ Reply

▶ Reply to Discussion