OG Lyrics (Reposted)
(Verse 1)
Raised in the middle of the land full of barbaque stands and the brothers ??? Hands
Every buddy gritten gettin grands Kansas city were the pretty women make you say DWAM!
Kicks it like a donkey cause we famous Cha Cha
Wicked women want me cause i came up Cha Cha
This is were the homies trip and say what
Yo we from the show get my money and we pay up
Got on my Five o Ones and my gritter posture
I fit her proper If she papered im in her choppers
Letin her know this ninna dinner cost her
and im famous squash her so animal like someone better get her doctor
This boys born and raised in KC
M.I.Z.Z.O.U. But once in a while i hit the L.K. for ladies
cause they straight B A.K. You
then back to Kansas city were is gates all on they plate
we think about it and we crave it when we vacate
i represent the MO and all the way to K state
Call me Tech N9ne but teachers and students call me A. Yates
(Hook)
Im hella fine like the food at Ollie Gates
Strawberry baked bean mixed plate
So everybody just bounce rock skate
Cant wait O.G. Ollie Gates
O.G. Like Ollie Gates
O.G. Like Ollie Gates
O.G. Ollie Gates
O.G. Baby
This is Kansas City
(Verse 2)
We be ??? pretty young things yo we got are selves in
Like dun deal im a popper Blouzin
Get her hot and ready listenin to Roger Troutmen
Rest In Peace baby, seven this beats crazy
Teach babyz we used to listen to this atleast 80
We kansas city steppin no question
we reppin 56 and 57 we know that if he jeffen then hes shady
K.C.K.'s gate got the chicken wing this'ell bring
traffic when the people ????
So you better be listening cause the don is sniffin green
This is the mission get ya when you hittin your nicotine
They got your money man and you know that they aint
somethin delicous yea you know the trey say gates
Thats the place were they come and getcha if the pay late
But i stay great cause everyones bangin the A. Yates
(Hook)
Im hella fine like the food at Ollie Gates
Strawberry baked bean mixed plate
So everybody just bounce rock skate
Cant wait O.G. Ollie Gates
O.G. Like Ollie Gates
O.G. Like Ollie Gates
O.G. Ollie Gates
O.G. Baby
(Verse 3)
North side were is you, EY
South side were is you, EY
East side were is you, EY
West side what i do, EY Tech N9ne
Aint no bodys sauce like this
Aint no other barbaque boss like this
The feel rellas might cost quite a bit
Ya we do it but the fire aint brought like this
O.G. told me go see
If the other citys Q is G.O.O.D.
But he knew that id find out slowly
Just like my KC barbaque they cannot hold me, A. Yates
(Hook)
Im hella fine like the food at Ollie Gates
Strawberry baked bean mixed plate
So everybody just bounce rock skate
Cant wait
Now everbody say
Lalalalalalalalalala, lalalalalalalalalala
Now Everybody Say
Lalalalalalalalalala, lalalalalalalalalala
Damn Boy
Views: 508
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by Shane on -
No, not capiche. I still say two wrongs make a right. Now lets see if you can follow along.
1.) You said if a baby was crying, it would be negative and with my theory you could replace that with another negative and kill the baby. Well if you dident understand with the negative stuff. I went into a mathmatical formation with negatives so you could understand my wrong theroy more. But i see what you mean. One up for you.
2.) Sending someone to sit in a small room all day is wrong isent it? Just forcing them to sit, listen, obey, and eat when told to. Even told when they can go out and smell the air. If you dident get it yet. I was refering to prison.
So if i was to kill another person, it would be wrong to do another wrong cause two wrongs dont make a right in your opinion. So what would you do? With your theroy you cant throw them in prison, that would be wrong. with your theroy our hole justice system would be wrong, no one would be responsible for there actions, and the world would be shit
Capiche
PS:Im not agreeing with all the laws the justice system has.
Siikez said:such effort you put in to achieve nothing but failure.
i explained your fail. and you failed to understand. so you fail.
why would you look at an action as an integer?
that makes no sense at all.
so you say its ok to kill a baby because its crying?
the crying you felt was a negative, so you killed it which is a negative, thus it balances out because if we "look at it mathematically" (which makes no sense because it is not mathematics related therefor such a hypothesis is null and void) you would be in the clear of wrong doing. which is not the case.
now you may not follow along here, but in short, you fail.
a failed fail, is in other words, an epic fail.
like tripping over holding an ice cream, and not only does the ice cream mess your face up, you also land in dog shit.
capiche?
Shane said:Actually if you look at it mathmatically, two negatives make a positive. You'd logically think a negative is a wrong and a positive is a right. So two wrongs make a right. So if i fail at failing, then its impossible for me to fail at all. But to say i fail at failing, then it wouldent make sence. Cause i cant fail if i fail to fail cause then there would be no fail, and fail would not exist in my world cause you couldent say i fail when i fail to fail.
You fail at trying to support the you fail at failing.
Siikez said:no, two wrongs dont make a right. follow along if you can.
Ordinary fail: You think running past a shoot out will be safe and you get shot.
Shane fail: You think running past a shoot out will be safe and you get stabbed.
thats a failed fail, not a success.
Shane said:If i fail at failing then i must be not failing at anything.
Nick Laird said:Fruit fly.
-
Permalink Reply by ֆӄʐ ♔ on -
firstly, i think spelling should be your first thing to get fixed, secondly would be to get your head fixed.
prison is not wrong, it is called "punishment". its suposed to be bad, its supposed to be miserable.
now that you understand the purpose of jail im sure you can figure the rest out for yourself.
in the mean time ill help your horrible spelling. there is a thing called an apostrophe, kinda looks like this '
you use it for words like: didn't, wasn't, couldn't, shouldn't etc.
you do not place an "e" in it's place.
its also acceptable in casual talk to leave out all punctuation marks as long as spelling is fine. except for fullstops and commas ofcourse. eg: shouldnt, couldnt, wouldnt.
i hope you have learned something.
please dont try to one up me, we are on different intellect levels and you would only hurt yourself.
peace.
Shane said:No, not capiche. I still say two wrongs make a right. Now lets see if you can follow along.
1.) You said if a baby was crying, it would be negative and with my theory you could replace that with another negative and kill the baby. Well if you dident understand with the negative stuff. I went into a mathmatical formation with negatives so you could understand my wrong theroy more. But i see what you mean. One up for you.
2.) Sending someone to sit in a small room all day is wrong isent it? Just forcing them to sit, listen, obey, and eat when told to. Even told when they can go out and smell the air. If you dident get it yet. I was refering to prison.
So if i was to kill another person, it would be wrong to do another wrong cause two wrongs dont make a right in your opinion. So what would you do? With your theroy you cant throw them in prison, that would be wrong. with your theroy our hole justice system would be wrong, no one would be responsible for there actions, and the world would be shit
Capiche
PS:Im not agreeing with all the laws the justice system has.
Siikez said:such effort you put in to achieve nothing but failure.
i explained your fail. and you failed to understand. so you fail.
why would you look at an action as an integer?
that makes no sense at all.
so you say its ok to kill a baby because its crying?
the crying you felt was a negative, so you killed it which is a negative, thus it balances out because if we "look at it mathematically" (which makes no sense because it is not mathematics related therefor such a hypothesis is null and void) you would be in the clear of wrong doing. which is not the case.
now you may not follow along here, but in short, you fail.
a failed fail, is in other words, an epic fail.
like tripping over holding an ice cream, and not only does the ice cream mess your face up, you also land in dog shit.
capiche?
Shane said:Actually if you look at it mathmatically, two negatives make a positive. You'd logically think a negative is a wrong and a positive is a right. So two wrongs make a right. So if i fail at failing, then its impossible for me to fail at all. But to say i fail at failing, then it wouldent make sence. Cause i cant fail if i fail to fail cause then there would be no fail, and fail would not exist in my world cause you couldent say i fail when i fail to fail.
You fail at trying to support the you fail at failing.
Siikez said:no, two wrongs dont make a right. follow along if you can.
Ordinary fail: You think running past a shoot out will be safe and you get shot.
Shane fail: You think running past a shoot out will be safe and you get stabbed.
thats a failed fail, not a success.
Shane said:If i fail at failing then i must be not failing at anything.
Nick Laird said:Fruit fly.
-
Permalink Reply by Shane on
-
So your saying makin someone miserable is right under certain circumstances. Its not wrong do that if you have a reason.
So lets say i did something against the law and they put me in prison, and i was miserable. Heres how it would work.
1.) I did something wrong so its wrong
2.) Making someone miserable can be considered wrong so its wrong.
3.) Putting someone in prison is a good punishment, good way to make two wrongs equal a right.
But all in all its all opinionated.
Siikez said:firstly, i think spelling should be your first thing to get fixed, secondly would be to get your head fixed.
prison is not wrong, it is called "punishment". its suposed to be bad, its supposed to be miserable.
now that you understand the purpose of jail im sure you can figure the rest out for yourself.
in the mean time ill help your horrible spelling. there is a thing called an apostrophe, kinda looks like this '
you use it for words like: didn't, wasn't, couldn't, shouldn't etc.
you do not place an "e" in it's place.
its also acceptable in casual talk to leave out all punctuation marks as long as spelling is fine. except for fullstops and commas ofcourse. eg: shouldnt, couldnt, wouldnt.
i hope you have learned something.
please dont try to one up me, we are on different intellect levels and you would only hurt yourself.
peace.
Shane said:No, not capiche. I still say two wrongs make a right. Now lets see if you can follow along.
1.) You said if a baby was crying, it would be negative and with my theory you could replace that with another negative and kill the baby. Well if you dident understand with the negative stuff. I went into a mathmatical formation with negatives so you could understand my wrong theroy more. But i see what you mean. One up for you.
2.) Sending someone to sit in a small room all day is wrong isent it? Just forcing them to sit, listen, obey, and eat when told to. Even told when they can go out and smell the air. If you dident get it yet. I was refering to prison.
So if i was to kill another person, it would be wrong to do another wrong cause two wrongs dont make a right in your opinion. So what would you do? With your theroy you cant throw them in prison, that would be wrong. with your theroy our hole justice system would be wrong, no one would be responsible for there actions, and the world would be shit
Capiche
PS:Im not agreeing with all the laws the justice system has.
Siikez said:such effort you put in to achieve nothing but failure.
i explained your fail. and you failed to understand. so you fail.
why would you look at an action as an integer?
that makes no sense at all.
so you say its ok to kill a baby because its crying?
the crying you felt was a negative, so you killed it which is a negative, thus it balances out because if we "look at it mathematically" (which makes no sense because it is not mathematics related therefor such a hypothesis is null and void) you would be in the clear of wrong doing. which is not the case.
now you may not follow along here, but in short, you fail.
a failed fail, is in other words, an epic fail.
like tripping over holding an ice cream, and not only does the ice cream mess your face up, you also land in dog shit.
capiche?
Shane said:Actually if you look at it mathmatically, two negatives make a positive. You'd logically think a negative is a wrong and a positive is a right. So two wrongs make a right. So if i fail at failing, then its impossible for me to fail at all. But to say i fail at failing, then it wouldent make sence. Cause i cant fail if i fail to fail cause then there would be no fail, and fail would not exist in my world cause you couldent say i fail when i fail to fail.
You fail at trying to support the you fail at failing.
Siikez said:no, two wrongs dont make a right. follow along if you can.
Ordinary fail: You think running past a shoot out will be safe and you get shot.
Shane fail: You think running past a shoot out will be safe and you get stabbed.
thats a failed fail, not a success.
Shane said:If i fail at failing then i must be not failing at anything.
Nick Laird said:Fruit fly.
-
Permalink Reply by ֆӄʐ ♔ on
-
ok it seems you couldnt figure the rest out yourself, see, theres a thing called justice.
a crime is only a crime because we deem it a crime punishable by law, you see where this is going?
im guessing not so we will carry on.
you do something you know in advance is a crime, therefor you know in advance punishment is sure to follow.
killing a baby because its crying however, has no means of justice other than your own.
this is like teaching a 5 year old wrong from right, how old are you?
because this should be embarassing for you.
Shane said:So your saying makin someone miserable is right under certain circumstances. Its not wrong do that if you have a reason.
So lets say i did something against the law and they put me in prison, and i was miserable. Heres how it would work.
1.) I did something wrong so its wrong
2.) Making someone miserable can be considered wrong so its wrong.
3.) Putting someone in prison is a good punishment, good way to make two wrongs equal a right.
But all in all its all opinionated.
Siikez said:firstly, i think spelling should be your first thing to get fixed, secondly would be to get your head fixed.
prison is not wrong, it is called "punishment". its suposed to be bad, its supposed to be miserable.
now that you understand the purpose of jail im sure you can figure the rest out for yourself.
in the mean time ill help your horrible spelling. there is a thing called an apostrophe, kinda looks like this '
you use it for words like: didn't, wasn't, couldn't, shouldn't etc.
you do not place an "e" in it's place.
its also acceptable in casual talk to leave out all punctuation marks as long as spelling is fine. except for fullstops and commas ofcourse. eg: shouldnt, couldnt, wouldnt.
i hope you have learned something.
please dont try to one up me, we are on different intellect levels and you would only hurt yourself.
peace.
Shane said:No, not capiche. I still say two wrongs make a right. Now lets see if you can follow along.
1.) You said if a baby was crying, it would be negative and with my theory you could replace that with another negative and kill the baby. Well if you dident understand with the negative stuff. I went into a mathmatical formation with negatives so you could understand my wrong theroy more. But i see what you mean. One up for you.
2.) Sending someone to sit in a small room all day is wrong isent it? Just forcing them to sit, listen, obey, and eat when told to. Even told when they can go out and smell the air. If you dident get it yet. I was refering to prison.
So if i was to kill another person, it would be wrong to do another wrong cause two wrongs dont make a right in your opinion. So what would you do? With your theroy you cant throw them in prison, that would be wrong. with your theroy our hole justice system would be wrong, no one would be responsible for there actions, and the world would be shit
Capiche
PS:Im not agreeing with all the laws the justice system has.
Siikez said:such effort you put in to achieve nothing but failure.
i explained your fail. and you failed to understand. so you fail.
why would you look at an action as an integer?
that makes no sense at all.
so you say its ok to kill a baby because its crying?
the crying you felt was a negative, so you killed it which is a negative, thus it balances out because if we "look at it mathematically" (which makes no sense because it is not mathematics related therefor such a hypothesis is null and void) you would be in the clear of wrong doing. which is not the case.
now you may not follow along here, but in short, you fail.
a failed fail, is in other words, an epic fail.
like tripping over holding an ice cream, and not only does the ice cream mess your face up, you also land in dog shit.
capiche?
Shane said:Actually if you look at it mathmatically, two negatives make a positive. You'd logically think a negative is a wrong and a positive is a right. So two wrongs make a right. So if i fail at failing, then its impossible for me to fail at all. But to say i fail at failing, then it wouldent make sence. Cause i cant fail if i fail to fail cause then there would be no fail, and fail would not exist in my world cause you couldent say i fail when i fail to fail.
You fail at trying to support the you fail at failing.
Siikez said:no, two wrongs dont make a right. follow along if you can.
Ordinary fail: You think running past a shoot out will be safe and you get shot.
Shane fail: You think running past a shoot out will be safe and you get stabbed.
thats a failed fail, not a success.
Shane said:If i fail at failing then i must be not failing at anything.
Nick Laird said:Fruit fly.
-
Permalink Reply by Deoxygenated on -
lyrics are still wrong.
-
Permalink Reply by ЖĭϞϬ ƦΔϟŦԃ on -
You fail.
thereal said:Thats wrong
-
Permalink Reply by Shane on
-
I never said killing a baby was right. When i said two wrongs make a right i ment that...I'll give an example.
Lets say someone killed your Family, would'nt you say it would be right to give them what they dished out. You would'nt have to go as far as killing there family but taken them out would be right.
Let's move back to the main point of subject. We kinda moved into law witch was created from opinions, and therefore can't be that accurate.
This is pretty much it.
Two wrongs make a right. People just turned the other wrong into a fancy word called punishment.
PS: I understand what you said in the previous posts. I dont know why your saying i did'nt. Mabye i should write a review on each and every post you made so you know that i actually read it and understood were you were comin from.
Capiche
Siikez said:ok it seems you couldnt figure the rest out yourself, see, theres a thing called justice.
a crime is only a crime because we deem it a crime punishable by law, you see where this is going?
im guessing not so we will carry on.
you do something you know in advance is a crime, therefor you know in advance punishment is sure to follow.
killing a baby because its crying however, has no means of justice other than your own.
this is like teaching a 5 year old wrong from right, how old are you?
because this should be embarassing for you.
Shane said:So your saying makin someone miserable is right under certain circumstances. Its not wrong do that if you have a reason.
So lets say i did something against the law and they put me in prison, and i was miserable. Heres how it would work.
1.) I did something wrong so its wrong
2.) Making someone miserable can be considered wrong so its wrong.
3.) Putting someone in prison is a good punishment, good way to make two wrongs equal a right.
But all in all its all opinionated.
Siikez said:firstly, i think spelling should be your first thing to get fixed, secondly would be to get your head fixed.
prison is not wrong, it is called "punishment". its suposed to be bad, its supposed to be miserable.
now that you understand the purpose of jail im sure you can figure the rest out for yourself.
in the mean time ill help your horrible spelling. there is a thing called an apostrophe, kinda looks like this '
you use it for words like: didn't, wasn't, couldn't, shouldn't etc.
you do not place an "e" in it's place.
its also acceptable in casual talk to leave out all punctuation marks as long as spelling is fine. except for fullstops and commas ofcourse. eg: shouldnt, couldnt, wouldnt.
i hope you have learned something.
please dont try to one up me, we are on different intellect levels and you would only hurt yourself.
peace.
Shane said:No, not capiche. I still say two wrongs make a right. Now lets see if you can follow along.
1.) You said if a baby was crying, it would be negative and with my theory you could replace that with another negative and kill the baby. Well if you dident understand with the negative stuff. I went into a mathmatical formation with negatives so you could understand my wrong theroy more. But i see what you mean. One up for you.
2.) Sending someone to sit in a small room all day is wrong isent it? Just forcing them to sit, listen, obey, and eat when told to. Even told when they can go out and smell the air. If you dident get it yet. I was refering to prison.
So if i was to kill another person, it would be wrong to do another wrong cause two wrongs dont make a right in your opinion. So what would you do? With your theroy you cant throw them in prison, that would be wrong. with your theroy our hole justice system would be wrong, no one would be responsible for there actions, and the world would be shit
Capiche
PS:Im not agreeing with all the laws the justice system has.
Siikez said:such effort you put in to achieve nothing but failure.
i explained your fail. and you failed to understand. so you fail.
why would you look at an action as an integer?
that makes no sense at all.
so you say its ok to kill a baby because its crying?
the crying you felt was a negative, so you killed it which is a negative, thus it balances out because if we "look at it mathematically" (which makes no sense because it is not mathematics related therefor such a hypothesis is null and void) you would be in the clear of wrong doing. which is not the case.
now you may not follow along here, but in short, you fail.
a failed fail, is in other words, an epic fail.
like tripping over holding an ice cream, and not only does the ice cream mess your face up, you also land in dog shit.
capiche?
Shane said:Actually if you look at it mathmatically, two negatives make a positive. You'd logically think a negative is a wrong and a positive is a right. So two wrongs make a right. So if i fail at failing, then its impossible for me to fail at all. But to say i fail at failing, then it wouldent make sence. Cause i cant fail if i fail to fail cause then there would be no fail, and fail would not exist in my world cause you couldent say i fail when i fail to fail.
You fail at trying to support the you fail at failing.
Siikez said:no, two wrongs dont make a right. follow along if you can.
Ordinary fail: You think running past a shoot out will be safe and you get shot.
Shane fail: You think running past a shoot out will be safe and you get stabbed.
thats a failed fail, not a success.
Shane said:If i fail at failing then i must be not failing at anything.
Nick Laird said:Fruit fly.
-
Permalink Reply by ֆӄʐ ♔ on
-
guh..
no, maybe if you lived in papua new guinea. they had or have a thing called eye for an eye.
but no we are civilised.
if someone was to kill my family i would deffinatly go to kill them, for my own mental justice, but i would know by doing so i would end up in jail. no matter the cause, wether it is out of good will or not, a crime is punishable by law. THAT is what seperates it from this two wrongs bull crap. which is why we see parents being on the verge of jail time for pulling the plug on a daughter begging to die. why is this so difficult to understand?
Shane said:I never said killing a baby was right. When i said two wrongs make a right i ment that...I'll give an example.
Lets say someone killed your Family, would'nt you say it would be right to give them what they dished out. You would'nt have to go as far as killing there family but taken them out would be right.
Let's move back to the main point of subject. We kinda moved into law witch was created from opinions, and therefore can't be that accurate.
This is pretty much it.
Two wrongs make a right. People just turned the other wrong into a fancy word called punishment.
PS: I understand what you said in the previous posts. I dont know why your saying i did'nt. Mabye i should write a review on each and every post you made so you know that i actually read it.
Siikez said:ok it seems you couldnt figure the rest out yourself, see, theres a thing called justice.
a crime is only a crime because we deem it a crime punishable by law, you see where this is going?
im guessing not so we will carry on.
you do something you know in advance is a crime, therefor you know in advance punishment is sure to follow.
killing a baby because its crying however, has no means of justice other than your own.
this is like teaching a 5 year old wrong from right, how old are you?
because this should be embarassing for you.
Shane said:So your saying makin someone miserable is right under certain circumstances. Its not wrong do that if you have a reason.
So lets say i did something against the law and they put me in prison, and i was miserable. Heres how it would work.
1.) I did something wrong so its wrong
2.) Making someone miserable can be considered wrong so its wrong.
3.) Putting someone in prison is a good punishment, good way to make two wrongs equal a right.
But all in all its all opinionated.
Siikez said:firstly, i think spelling should be your first thing to get fixed, secondly would be to get your head fixed.
prison is not wrong, it is called "punishment". its suposed to be bad, its supposed to be miserable.
now that you understand the purpose of jail im sure you can figure the rest out for yourself.
in the mean time ill help your horrible spelling. there is a thing called an apostrophe, kinda looks like this '
you use it for words like: didn't, wasn't, couldn't, shouldn't etc.
you do not place an "e" in it's place.
its also acceptable in casual talk to leave out all punctuation marks as long as spelling is fine. except for fullstops and commas ofcourse. eg: shouldnt, couldnt, wouldnt.
i hope you have learned something.
please dont try to one up me, we are on different intellect levels and you would only hurt yourself.
peace.
Shane said:No, not capiche. I still say two wrongs make a right. Now lets see if you can follow along.
1.) You said if a baby was crying, it would be negative and with my theory you could replace that with another negative and kill the baby. Well if you dident understand with the negative stuff. I went into a mathmatical formation with negatives so you could understand my wrong theroy more. But i see what you mean. One up for you.
2.) Sending someone to sit in a small room all day is wrong isent it? Just forcing them to sit, listen, obey, and eat when told to. Even told when they can go out and smell the air. If you dident get it yet. I was refering to prison.
So if i was to kill another person, it would be wrong to do another wrong cause two wrongs dont make a right in your opinion. So what would you do? With your theroy you cant throw them in prison, that would be wrong. with your theroy our hole justice system would be wrong, no one would be responsible for there actions, and the world would be shit
Capiche
PS:Im not agreeing with all the laws the justice system has.
Siikez said:such effort you put in to achieve nothing but failure.
i explained your fail. and you failed to understand. so you fail.
why would you look at an action as an integer?
that makes no sense at all.
so you say its ok to kill a baby because its crying?
the crying you felt was a negative, so you killed it which is a negative, thus it balances out because if we "look at it mathematically" (which makes no sense because it is not mathematics related therefor such a hypothesis is null and void) you would be in the clear of wrong doing. which is not the case.
now you may not follow along here, but in short, you fail.
a failed fail, is in other words, an epic fail.
like tripping over holding an ice cream, and not only does the ice cream mess your face up, you also land in dog shit.
capiche?
Shane said:Actually if you look at it mathmatically, two negatives make a positive. You'd logically think a negative is a wrong and a positive is a right. So two wrongs make a right. So if i fail at failing, then its impossible for me to fail at all. But to say i fail at failing, then it wouldent make sence. Cause i cant fail if i fail to fail cause then there would be no fail, and fail would not exist in my world cause you couldent say i fail when i fail to fail.
You fail at trying to support the you fail at failing.
Siikez said:no, two wrongs dont make a right. follow along if you can.
Ordinary fail: You think running past a shoot out will be safe and you get shot.
Shane fail: You think running past a shoot out will be safe and you get stabbed.
thats a failed fail, not a success.
Shane said:If i fail at failing then i must be not failing at anything.
Nick Laird said:Fruit fly.
-
Permalink Reply by Shane on
-
Neither of us can be right. This subject is all opinionated. Yes, we know are crime is punishable by law. But picture were in a new world. There was never a law system created. Then would you say two wrongs make a right?
PS: Get out of law i was'nt talking about that in the first place!!!!!
Siikez said:guh..
no, maybe if you lived in papua new guinea. they had or have a thing called eye for an eye.
but no we are civilised.
if someone was to kill my family i would deffinatly go to kill them, for my own mental justice, but i would know by doing so i would end up in jail. no matter the cause, wether it is out of good will or not, a crime is punishable by law. THAT is what seperates it from this two wrongs bull crap. which is why we see parents being on the verge of jail time for pulling the plug on a daughter begging to die. why is this so difficult to understand?
Shane said:I never said killing a baby was right. When i said two wrongs make a right i ment that...I'll give an example.
Lets say someone killed your Family, would'nt you say it would be right to give them what they dished out. You would'nt have to go as far as killing there family but taken them out would be right.
Let's move back to the main point of subject. We kinda moved into law witch was created from opinions, and therefore can't be that accurate.
This is pretty much it.
Two wrongs make a right. People just turned the other wrong into a fancy word called punishment.
PS: I understand what you said in the previous posts. I dont know why your saying i did'nt. Mabye i should write a review on each and every post you made so you know that i actually read it.
Siikez said:ok it seems you couldnt figure the rest out yourself, see, theres a thing called justice.
a crime is only a crime because we deem it a crime punishable by law, you see where this is going?
im guessing not so we will carry on.
you do something you know in advance is a crime, therefor you know in advance punishment is sure to follow.
killing a baby because its crying however, has no means of justice other than your own.
this is like teaching a 5 year old wrong from right, how old are you?
because this should be embarassing for you.
Shane said:So your saying makin someone miserable is right under certain circumstances. Its not wrong do that if you have a reason.
So lets say i did something against the law and they put me in prison, and i was miserable. Heres how it would work.
1.) I did something wrong so its wrong
2.) Making someone miserable can be considered wrong so its wrong.
3.) Putting someone in prison is a good punishment, good way to make two wrongs equal a right.
But all in all its all opinionated.
Siikez said:firstly, i think spelling should be your first thing to get fixed, secondly would be to get your head fixed.
prison is not wrong, it is called "punishment". its suposed to be bad, its supposed to be miserable.
now that you understand the purpose of jail im sure you can figure the rest out for yourself.
in the mean time ill help your horrible spelling. there is a thing called an apostrophe, kinda looks like this '
you use it for words like: didn't, wasn't, couldn't, shouldn't etc.
you do not place an "e" in it's place.
its also acceptable in casual talk to leave out all punctuation marks as long as spelling is fine. except for fullstops and commas ofcourse. eg: shouldnt, couldnt, wouldnt.
i hope you have learned something.
please dont try to one up me, we are on different intellect levels and you would only hurt yourself.
peace.
Shane said:No, not capiche. I still say two wrongs make a right. Now lets see if you can follow along.
1.) You said if a baby was crying, it would be negative and with my theory you could replace that with another negative and kill the baby. Well if you dident understand with the negative stuff. I went into a mathmatical formation with negatives so you could understand my wrong theroy more. But i see what you mean. One up for you.
2.) Sending someone to sit in a small room all day is wrong isent it? Just forcing them to sit, listen, obey, and eat when told to. Even told when they can go out and smell the air. If you dident get it yet. I was refering to prison.
So if i was to kill another person, it would be wrong to do another wrong cause two wrongs dont make a right in your opinion. So what would you do? With your theroy you cant throw them in prison, that would be wrong. with your theroy our hole justice system would be wrong, no one would be responsible for there actions, and the world would be shit
Capiche
PS:Im not agreeing with all the laws the justice system has.
Siikez said:such effort you put in to achieve nothing but failure.
i explained your fail. and you failed to understand. so you fail.
why would you look at an action as an integer?
that makes no sense at all.
so you say its ok to kill a baby because its crying?
the crying you felt was a negative, so you killed it which is a negative, thus it balances out because if we "look at it mathematically" (which makes no sense because it is not mathematics related therefor such a hypothesis is null and void) you would be in the clear of wrong doing. which is not the case.
now you may not follow along here, but in short, you fail.
a failed fail, is in other words, an epic fail.
like tripping over holding an ice cream, and not only does the ice cream mess your face up, you also land in dog shit.
capiche?
Shane said:Actually if you look at it mathmatically, two negatives make a positive. You'd logically think a negative is a wrong and a positive is a right. So two wrongs make a right. So if i fail at failing, then its impossible for me to fail at all. But to say i fail at failing, then it wouldent make sence. Cause i cant fail if i fail to fail cause then there would be no fail, and fail would not exist in my world cause you couldent say i fail when i fail to fail.
You fail at trying to support the you fail at failing.
Siikez said:no, two wrongs dont make a right. follow along if you can.
Ordinary fail: You think running past a shoot out will be safe and you get shot.
Shane fail: You think running past a shoot out will be safe and you get stabbed.
thats a failed fail, not a success.
Shane said:If i fail at failing then i must be not failing at anything.
Nick Laird said:Fruit fly.
-
Permalink Reply by Nick James on -
hahahahaha. Thats hilarious. Get stabbed. Thats funny. And i personally go to google quickly but its easier when you know how to use the english language correctly so you probably won't have much luck.
Siikez said:no, two wrongs dont make a right. follow along if you can.
Ordinary fail: You think running past a shoot out will be safe and you get shot.
Shane fail: You think running past a shoot out will be safe and you get stabbed.
thats a failed fail, not a success.
Shane said:If i fail at failing then i must be not failing at anything.
Nick Laird said:Fruit fly.
- ‹ Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›
S.O.S. Sale - Half Off Strange Music Gear!
¡MAYDAY! "Believers" Pre-Order Now Available
Rittz "The Life And Times Of Jonny Valiant" Pre-order Now!
Wrekonize "The War Within" Pre-Order Available!
CES Cru “Constant Energy Struggles” Purchase Now!
Kutt Calhoun "Black Gold" Album Now Available!
Brotha Lynch Hung "Mannibalector" Album In Stores Now!
Tech N9ne's Hostile Takeover: The Story Behind The Tour
Prozak "Nocturnal" EP Now Available!
Krizz Kaliko "Neh' Mind" EP Now Available!
Tech N9ne – ‘E.B.A.H.’/'Boiling Point’ Combo EP Now In Stores!
Tech N9ne "Boiling Point" EP Now Available!
Stevie Stone "Momentum" EP Now Available!
Tech N9ne "E.B.A.H." EP Now Available!
Kutt Calhoun "Kelvin" EP Now Available!
Ces Cru "13" EP Now Available!
¡MAYDAY! "Thrift Store Halos" EP Now Available!
Tech N9ne Blog
POLL: Favorite Tech N9ne T-Shirt?
The S.O.S. Sale is upon us, which means all your favorite merchandise on strangemusicinc.net is available at 50% off! Before they’re all gone, we want to ask you, the fans, which Tech N9ne t-shirt is your favorite. This helps us know which ones to keep making more of and which ones are better served as rags [...]Strange Music S.O.S. Sale – 50% Off At strangemusicinc.net!
The weather is heating up and you know what that means, right? Time for the S.O.S. sale! For a limited time, you can get your hands on trunkloads of Strange Music gear at 50% off during the S.O.S. sale! Don’t miss out on your favorite Jerseys T-shirts Tank tops Music* and more at an incredible discount [...]TECHnologic: Imagining Daft Punk x Tech N9ne [Discussion]
As 2013 rolls on, fans on the web continue to push rumors and speculation as to just who Tech N9ne will link up with next for his Something Else LP. From alternative rock heavyweights to rap’s elite, it seems like no one is off limits in the discussion. With the recent release of their Random [...]‘Get Your Ass To Soundset’ – Tech N9ne Heads To Minnesota For Soundset Festival 2013
This weekend, Tech N9ne and Strange Music join some of hip hop’s biggest names in Shakopee, MN for Soundset 2013. The massive music festival, presented by Rhymesayers Ent., brings together fans from all corners hip hop for a day of live performances featuring the likes of Atmosphere, Snoop Dogg, Busta Rhymes, Schoolboy Q, R.A. The [...]Rest In Peace To Founding Doors Member And Music Legend Ray Manzarek
Today the music world lost one of the greatest to ever touch a keyboard. Ray Manzarek, one of the two founding members of The Doors, passed away at the age of 74. It was in July of 1965 that a random encounter between the prodigious keyboardist and Jim Morrison would eventually turn into one [...]© 2013 Created by Strange Admin.
