Frank Ocean Confesses Sexuality

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by ＭʞƝ♕ on July 6, 2012 at 5:21am

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by ֆӄʐ ♔ on July 6, 2012 at 5:29am

You live by black and white, that's a sign that you were brought up this way. Call a straight person gay, they're more than likely not going to like that, hence why "gay" and "fag" is used by almost everybody as an insult, not because it's "bad to be gay" but because it's something they're not. Like calling someone a girl, a woman, or a bitch. Not because chicks are "bad" but because that dude doesn't want to be called a woman. I think you probably caught up with me now, if I give you some credit I'll just guess you understand now. But I think we've all seen now how dimwitted and stupid you are so we can expect to see pointless loop holes and twists, in a failed attempt at getting your loose ends to match up. I'm beating a dead horse here, and like you said, you don't like the 5 on 1 argument you got yourself into, so if you manage to find another human with your view point let me know. They have to be under 60 by the way. In all seriousness, I'm glad people like you are becoming thinned out. :D

BottledMindFrame said:

I expected my point to fly completely over your unintelligent mind lol. Let me put this in layman's terms for you once again as I had to in chat since that seems to be the only way you're able to grasp anything above an elementary school level. You along with a couple of others were claiming in chat that by me using words like "fag" (etc.) and by looking down upon their choice to lead that lifestyle that I'm homophobic. Are you still with me here? Try to keep up with this next point that proves how hypocritical you are. It doesn't matter if you're calling somebody who's straight or gay a "fag" (etc.) as an insult for it to imply that those people or types of behavior are perceived as bad, wrong, or shameful to you. Otherwise you wouldn't attempt to use it as an insult in the first place. Yet here you are in chat and in this thread all the sudden now a homosexual activist (lulz) when your history already shows as proven that you have no problem trying to demean other people with slurs that carry a meaning that would essentially define a homophobic in your eyes. Completely hypocritical and actually quite hilarious to me as you are trapped in a corner with nowhere to go at this point. As stated in my last post I expected you to come up with some sort of pathetic defense to undermine your proven hypocritical logic so I'm not surprised at all you'd play it off like I'm calling you homophobic. By your "standards" you're calling yourself homophobic. To say otherwise just proves your double-standard, which you just have.

P.S. LMFA(ツ) @ you jumping at the sight JazzMan cosign (who's an obvious troll and probably Siikez alt account lol)

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by 2s5szpayohr9r on July 6, 2012 at 5:36am

Pretty pointless making a swift rebuttal to one of the biggest forum trolls but alas here you are. There's not any "legit psychological proof". There may be "legit psychological studies" but definitely not substantial fact to one-hundred percent back their claims which in turn you believe. I'm not going to sit here and attempt to disprove what you're saying because I can't and I understand that but nor can you disprove what I truly believe and many others truly believe to be a choice. Let me put it this way for you...

If there was a homosexual gene, how would it be passed from generation to generation? Obviously homosexual partners do not reproduce, and thus they cannot carry their "gay gene" on (as Siikez would claim). A homosexual male could donate his sperm to a homosexual female's egg I suppose, and hypothetically produce a homosexual child with that logic, but that's not a very common practice nor is it where most homosexuals arise. The majority of homosexuals come from two heterosexual parents, because only heterosexual intercourse can produce a child. Therefore for you to say some sort of "gay gene" if you will caused an infant at birth to begin the course of his life as a homosexual is completely ridiculous.

That's why when Siikez was at a standstill and agreed to disagree it was nearly his only option at that point. Throughout history up until today it's always been perceived and accepted as a choice (which I still firmly believe). This ideology/research/theory (take your pick) is trying to suggest otherwise and hasn't been able to scientifically prove what it's claiming, it only can suggest. They're going against common acceptance and quite frankly common sense as in their side needs to be proved to be accepted where as the former does not. You can't sit there and call me ignorant because of my beliefs (which are commonly accepted) when there's not even basis of solid proof behind yours even if you'd like to call it such.

 

JazzMan said:

There is legit, psychological proof that 'being gay' is actually in human genetics and being gay is actually purely natural. Don't believe me? Go back to school and take a psychology class as the evidence is shown everywhere there and you would be ignorant to think otherwise. It works in the same way that nature gives males and females specific behaviour that characterises that specific gender. The way a person behaves isn't all to do with nuture like you would like to believe. You would say that this doesn't disprove what you are saying, but can you disprove what I'm saying? Good luck to you.

Another thing on homosexuality being perfectly natural, look at the animal kingdom, homosexuality is everywhere in the animal kingdom and it's got nothing to do with nuture at all, it's all to do with just the way they naturally are. Humans share 98.5% of DNA with monkey species which are known to naturally be 'strictly bisexual'.

If you have anymore issues with gays, then it's obvious that the issues are personal rather than factual belief.

BottledMindFrame said:

Lol yes and you're counting a total of what... Four people? You equate four people who are your core group of chat buddies (probably your only friends in reality) to everybody. SMFH... Do you see me holding picket signs protesting gay rights concerning myself with their choices? Not at all because I simply don't give a fuck about those individuals. You seem to equate not agreeing with or not condoning their way of life to concerning myself with them. There is a huge difference there that you will never probably get through your thick dimwitted skull. Also, I won't deny that I stated in the hypothetical situation that my son were to ever make that choice that he'd lose his relationship with his father. I don't agree with or condone their entire community so why the fuck would I support my son if he were to decide to take part in that lifestyle? At least I'm standing firm on my beliefs which is more than anyone can say for you. Think I'm bullshitting? Well lets talk about double-standards for a minute. During our chat debate you along with your couple of "friends" were quick to quote me using the word "fag" matched with my views and called me a homophobe. Let me swiftly own you once more and reveal how you are not only a hypocrite, but by your standards a homophobe also.

So there you have it... Frank Ocean comes out of the closet and now all of the sudden you're a gay rights activist and will go to the ends of the Earth to change people's beliefs that homosexuality is normal and due to genetics (which is still false). On the other hand you'll insult people by calling them "gay", "faggot", or telling them to "hit the gay bar and get off my site". You'll probably respond by saying you were merely joking or something to the effect but that's just a complete cop out and excuse for you being caught for your hypocritical ways. Even if you try to make the rebuttal that you're not actually talking to a legit gay person it doesn't matter because you are using those words in a derogatory fashion implying that homosexuality is bad and shameful when you just tried to go out of your way to claim the opposite. At least when I'm using one of those terms I also stand firm by my original statement and beliefs. Like I said earlier in chat you're a complete clown as well as an enormous hypocrite. Hell by your "standards" you're even a homophobe as well with those screenshots as proof. Lol see how stupid you look Siikez? Point proven ladies and gentlemen.

Siikez said:

Everybody, behold, people actually have this barbaric belief still LOL.

I gave you the chance to explain yourself 1 on 1, without the dissing, you left me speechless, like I was talking to a Westborough Baptist member. But if you want to take that as "you had no ground to stand on" to make yourself feel like you actually made points other than your retarded points go ahead Lmao.

After I gave up in making you see the truth, Cole, Tie, Matt, Crow and TK got involved and realised your homophobic views and naturally they called you out. The same way they would call out a racist or an equally as hateful person as you. 

You say you aren't homophobic but when asked what you would do if your son told you he was gay, you said he would suffer the consequences of not having a relationship with his father. 

Please continue to argue, more people need to see what kind of goon you are lol.

I love how you still remain that you "served" anybody anything, because not a single person in chat agrees with you. I've always said you were in denial, I've just found my proof. lmao.

BottledMindFrame said:

FALSE

I logged off chat because I see no point in proceeding on with a pointless argument while getting flamed by four separate people who all share the same point of view. I'm not homophobic, are you heterophobic? Like I said earlier if the shoe fits then wear it. You didn't see me becoming offended that you support gays, I simply stated and stood by the fact I don't agree with you and believe it to be an unnatural choice. You're more immature than I already thought you were honestly. One on one debate you were left without much ground to stand on as neither point could be one-hundred percent proven and agreed to disagree. Once you had multiple people on chat willing to back you on your standpoint you proceeded to chastise me for my beliefs. That just proves my point that you're unintelligent and fake. Say what you will, I could care less. If someone chooses to lead that lifestyle so be it, that doesn't mean I agree with their choice or condone their actions. Who really was slaughtered in this situation? In terms of how many people agreed with who... Sure feel free to say me. In terms of intelligence and intellectuality... I definitely served you the coldest dish of reality with a pimp slap to match. Go to sleep with that.  

Siikez said:

Well that "debate in chat" ended in BMF getting slaughtered by several people for his homophobic views and he bailed. Lmao

#NUFFSAID

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by ֆӄʐ ♔ on July 6, 2012 at 5:41am

I like how you try to misinterperate my explanation to you, but I think you're not trying to lie about my point of view, but infact didn't understand it. How sad. 

BottledMindFrame said:

Pretty pointless making a swift rebuttal to one of the biggest forum trolls but alas here you are. There's not any "legit psychological proof". There may be "legit psychological studies" but definitely not substantial fact to one-hundred percent back their claims which in turn you believe. I'm not going to sit here and attempt to disprove what you're saying because I can't and I understand that but nor can you disprove what I truly believe and many others truly believe to be a choice. Let me put it this way for you...

If there was a homosexual gene, how would it be passed from generation to generation? Obviously homosexual partners do not reproduce, and thus they cannot carry their "gay gene" on (as Siikez would claim). A homosexual male could donate his sperm to a homosexual female's egg I suppose, and hypothetically produce a homosexual child with that logic, but that's not a very common practice nor is it where most homosexuals arise. The majority of homosexuals come from two heterosexual parents, because only heterosexual intercourse can produce a child. Therefore for you to say some sort of "gay gene" if you will caused an infant at birth to begin the course of his life as a homosexual is completely ridiculous.

That's why when Siikez was at a standstill and agreed to disagree it was nearly his only option at that point. Throughout history up until today it's always been perceived and accepted as a choice (which I still firmly believe). This ideology/research/theory (take your pick) is trying to suggest otherwise and hasn't been able to scientifically prove what it's claiming, it only can suggest. They're going against common acceptance and quite frankly common sense as in their side needs to be proved to be accepted where as the former does not. You can't sit there and call me ignorant because of my beliefs (which are commonly accepted) when there's not even basis of solid proof behind yours even if you'd like to call it such.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by JazzMan on July 6, 2012 at 5:41am

In what way is it ridiculous? You are just stating an opinion on something you know nothing about. Until you actually educate yourself on Psychology, then all your opinions on this matter are irrelevant and fueled by hatred rather than acutal factual evidence. As for Psychology just being a theory... ever heard of the theory of gravity, or don't you believe in that either.
 
BottledMindFrame said:

Pretty pointless making a swift rebuttal to one of the biggest forum trolls but alas here you are. There's not any "legit psychological proof". There may be "legit psychological studies" but definitely not substantial fact to one-hundred percent back their claims which in turn you believe. I'm not going to sit here and attempt to disprove what you're saying because I can't and I understand that but nor can you disprove what I truly believe and many others truly believe to be a choice. Let me put it this way for you...

If there was a homosexual gene, how would it be passed from generation to generation? Obviously homosexual partners do not reproduce, and thus they cannot carry their "gay gene" on (as Siikez would claim). A homosexual male could donate his sperm to a homosexual female's egg I suppose, and hypothetically produce a homosexual child with that logic, but that's not a very common practice nor is it where most homosexuals arise. The majority of homosexuals come from two heterosexual parents, because only heterosexual intercourse can produce a child. Therefore for you to say some sort of "gay gene" if you will caused an infant at birth to begin the course of his life as a homosexual is completely ridiculous.

That's why when Siikez was at a standstill and agreed to disagree it was nearly his only option at that point. Throughout history up until today it's always been perceived and accepted as a choice (which I still firmly believe). This ideology/research/theory (take your pick) is trying to suggest otherwise and hasn't been able to scientifically prove what it's claiming, it only can suggest. They're going against common acceptance and quite frankly common sense as in their side needs to be proved to be accepted where as the former does not. You can't sit there and call me ignorant because of my beliefs (which are commonly accepted) when there's not even basis of solid proof behind yours even if you'd like to call it such.

 

JazzMan said:

There is legit, psychological proof that 'being gay' is actually in human genetics and being gay is actually purely natural. Don't believe me? Go back to school and take a psychology class as the evidence is shown everywhere there and you would be ignorant to think otherwise. It works in the same way that nature gives males and females specific behaviour that characterises that specific gender. The way a person behaves isn't all to do with nuture like you would like to believe. You would say that this doesn't disprove what you are saying, but can you disprove what I'm saying? Good luck to you.

Another thing on homosexuality being perfectly natural, look at the animal kingdom, homosexuality is everywhere in the animal kingdom and it's got nothing to do with nuture at all, it's all to do with just the way they naturally are. Humans share 98.5% of DNA with monkey species which are known to naturally be 'strictly bisexual'.

If you have anymore issues with gays, then it's obvious that the issues are personal rather than factual belief.

BottledMindFrame said:

Lol yes and you're counting a total of what... Four people? You equate four people who are your core group of chat buddies (probably your only friends in reality) to everybody. SMFH... Do you see me holding picket signs protesting gay rights concerning myself with their choices? Not at all because I simply don't give a fuck about those individuals. You seem to equate not agreeing with or not condoning their way of life to concerning myself with them. There is a huge difference there that you will never probably get through your thick dimwitted skull. Also, I won't deny that I stated in the hypothetical situation that my son were to ever make that choice that he'd lose his relationship with his father. I don't agree with or condone their entire community so why the fuck would I support my son if he were to decide to take part in that lifestyle? At least I'm standing firm on my beliefs which is more than anyone can say for you. Think I'm bullshitting? Well lets talk about double-standards for a minute. During our chat debate you along with your couple of "friends" were quick to quote me using the word "fag" matched with my views and called me a homophobe. Let me swiftly own you once more and reveal how you are not only a hypocrite, but by your standards a homophobe also.

So there you have it... Frank Ocean comes out of the closet and now all of the sudden you're a gay rights activist and will go to the ends of the Earth to change people's beliefs that homosexuality is normal and due to genetics (which is still false). On the other hand you'll insult people by calling them "gay", "faggot", or telling them to "hit the gay bar and get off my site". You'll probably respond by saying you were merely joking or something to the effect but that's just a complete cop out and excuse for you being caught for your hypocritical ways. Even if you try to make the rebuttal that you're not actually talking to a legit gay person it doesn't matter because you are using those words in a derogatory fashion implying that homosexuality is bad and shameful when you just tried to go out of your way to claim the opposite. At least when I'm using one of those terms I also stand firm by my original statement and beliefs. Like I said earlier in chat you're a complete clown as well as an enormous hypocrite. Hell by your "standards" you're even a homophobe as well with those screenshots as proof. Lol see how stupid you look Siikez? Point proven ladies and gentlemen.

Siikez said:

Everybody, behold, people actually have this barbaric belief still LOL.

I gave you the chance to explain yourself 1 on 1, without the dissing, you left me speechless, like I was talking to a Westborough Baptist member. But if you want to take that as "you had no ground to stand on" to make yourself feel like you actually made points other than your retarded points go ahead Lmao.

After I gave up in making you see the truth, Cole, Tie, Matt, Crow and TK got involved and realised your homophobic views and naturally they called you out. The same way they would call out a racist or an equally as hateful person as you. 

You say you aren't homophobic but when asked what you would do if your son told you he was gay, you said he would suffer the consequences of not having a relationship with his father. 

Please continue to argue, more people need to see what kind of goon you are lol.

I love how you still remain that you "served" anybody anything, because not a single person in chat agrees with you. I've always said you were in denial, I've just found my proof. lmao.

BottledMindFrame said:

FALSE

I logged off chat because I see no point in proceeding on with a pointless argument while getting flamed by four separate people who all share the same point of view. I'm not homophobic, are you heterophobic? Like I said earlier if the shoe fits then wear it. You didn't see me becoming offended that you support gays, I simply stated and stood by the fact I don't agree with you and believe it to be an unnatural choice. You're more immature than I already thought you were honestly. One on one debate you were left without much ground to stand on as neither point could be one-hundred percent proven and agreed to disagree. Once you had multiple people on chat willing to back you on your standpoint you proceeded to chastise me for my beliefs. That just proves my point that you're unintelligent and fake. Say what you will, I could care less. If someone chooses to lead that lifestyle so be it, that doesn't mean I agree with their choice or condone their actions. Who really was slaughtered in this situation? In terms of how many people agreed with who... Sure feel free to say me. In terms of intelligence and intellectuality... I definitely served you the coldest dish of reality with a pimp slap to match. Go to sleep with that.  

Siikez said:

Well that "debate in chat" ended in BMF getting slaughtered by several people for his homophobic views and he bailed. Lmao

#NUFFSAID

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by JazzMan on July 6, 2012 at 5:44am

For everybody who believes that human behaviour is completely determined by nurture as opposed to nature. Watch the documentary "The Fight To Be Male". Nature has a huge role in determining human behaviour.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by ֆӄʐ ♔ on July 6, 2012 at 5:55am

As for why I accepted your request to agree to disagree. I have about as much chance of changing your mind as changing these peoples mind. Tell me, how long would you argue with these people before giving up on them? As far as I'm concern, you are one of these people. 

Take some time out, watch the 4 parts. You'll ofcourse say "they're religiously fueled, I'm not". You are just as uselessly determined to believe your hate as much as these people. So regardless of what you say from this point, you're like them.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by 2s5szpayohr9r on July 6, 2012 at 5:59am

Again I expected you to completely try to disregard the legitimate proof that you are entirely a hypocrite by putting your own take to what your huge double-standard truly is. You along with a few other people in chat were the one quoting my statement followed with the word "fag" and attempting to use it to your advantage by sarcastically saying "oh yeah... clearly not a homophobe". The fact is those were only a few screenshots of nearly dozens upon dozens of you bashing somebody else on this forum on the "you're a faggot" or "you're gay" basis. You even go in depth with your diss at times, which was already displayed. I already predicted your pathetic desperate defense before you even attempted to lay it out. That just shows how far ahead of you I really am. You then continue to dance as the puppet confined to the strings I command as I watch this unfold. It's actually very comical might I add. Funny you try to claim I'm putting a twist on things when you're the undeniably proven hypocrite as well as a habitual liar/troll/manipulator. Of course you'd try to flip the fact of that in your favor but to no avail you fail once more. Typical for someone backed up against a wall as you are, I almost feel sorry for you man (almost). You're still completely missing the point that you're obviously too feebleminded to grasp (I won't say dimwitted again seeing as how you can't come with your own insults and resort to stealing mine) which is your blantant hypocrisy and double-standard. I don't agree with a lifestyle that you can't even legitimately prove your standpoint on, so that makes me a homophobe in your eyes because you don't agree? You'd then try to solidify this by quoting me using "offensive" slang towards gays that you yourself use in an attempt to make your point seem stronger? Lmfao! Exactly why I pointed out the obvious truth in chat that you're a clown. It's okay for you to believe something that's not even unquestionably proven as well as use derogatory terms which insults a lifestyle you're defending but it's not okay for me to stand by my beliefs and speak a certain way when I actually stand by it? Please bitch, give me a break you're in over your head at this point son. I'm really talking to a wall at this point, although even conversing with dry-wall would be more entertaining than this. The funniest part about it all is you still don't seem to realize how big of a jackass you look like. Or maybe you truly do and are just too embarrassed to admit it, I wouldn't expect it from an egotistical condescending bastard such as yourself.

L(ツ)L

Siikez said:

You live by black and white, that's a sign that you were brought up this way. Call a straight person gay, they're more than likely not going to like that, hence why "gay" and "fag" is used by almost everybody as an insult, not because it's "bad to be gay" but because it's something they're not. Like calling someone a girl, a woman, or a bitch. Not because chicks are "bad" but because that dude doesn't want to be called a woman. I think you probably caught up with me now, if I give you some credit I'll just guess you understand now. But I think we've all seen now how dimwitted and stupid you are so we can expect to see pointless loop holes and twists, in a failed attempt at getting your loose ends to match up. I'm beating a dead horse here, and like you said, you don't like the 5 on 1 argument you got yourself into, so if you manage to find another human with your view point let me know. They have to be under 60 by the way. In all seriousness, I'm glad people like you are becoming thinned out. :D

BottledMindFrame said:

I expected my point to fly completely over your unintelligent mind lol. Let me put this in layman's terms for you once again as I had to in chat since that seems to be the only way you're able to grasp anything above an elementary school level. You along with a couple of others were claiming in chat that by me using words like "fag" (etc.) and by looking down upon their choice to lead that lifestyle that I'm homophobic. Are you still with me here? Try to keep up with this next point that proves how hypocritical you are. It doesn't matter if you're calling somebody who's straight or gay a "fag" (etc.) as an insult for it to imply that those people or types of behavior are perceived as bad, wrong, or shameful to you. Otherwise you wouldn't attempt to use it as an insult in the first place. Yet here you are in chat and in this thread all the sudden now a homosexual activist (lulz) when your history already shows as proven that you have no problem trying to demean other people with slurs that carry a meaning that would essentially define a homophobic in your eyes. Completely hypocritical and actually quite hilarious to me as you are trapped in a corner with nowhere to go at this point. As stated in my last post I expected you to come up with some sort of pathetic defense to undermine your proven hypocritical logic so I'm not surprised at all you'd play it off like I'm calling you homophobic. By your "standards" you're calling yourself homophobic. To say otherwise just proves your double-standard, which you just have.

P.S. LMFA(ツ) @ you jumping at the sight JazzMan cosign (who's an obvious troll and probably Siikez alt account lol)

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Vin Detta on July 6, 2012 at 6:02am

How ironic, Jazzman is using a stereotype against a stereotype. All of us hip-hop fans must be against homosexuals. You just made one of the most hypocritical statements I've ever seen. Look, if gay people want to get married then so be it. It doesn't effect my life in any way shape or form. I don't know if you, Jazzman, were trying to make a joke about the statement you made (which I hope you were). Because if not, you just made yourself look like a moron.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by ֆӄʐ ♔ on July 6, 2012 at 6:04am

I think I'm going to have to start drawing pictures for you to understand things, I've never met someone so ill informed in almost every aspect of knowledge. But like I said, you can't be held accountable for the way you were brought up, you were obviously taught some terrible things that can't be fixed in your head. I still find reassurance that people like you are being thinned out. Please, continue to rant and twist words, it's a good way for more and more people to see you for the genuine homophobe you are. Still haven't found anybody that shares your point of view, let me know when they arrive. 

BottledMindFrame said:

Again I expected you to completely try to disregard the legitimate proof that you are entirely a hypocrite by putting your own take to what your huge double-standard truly is. You along with a few other people in chat were the one quoting my statement followed with the word "fag" and attempting to use it to your advantage by sarcastically saying "oh yeah... clearly not a homophobe". The fact is those were only a few screenshots of nearly dozens upon dozens of you bashing somebody else on this forum on the "you're a faggot" or "you're gay" basis. You even go in depth with your diss at times, which was already displayed. I already predicted your pathetic desperate defense before you even attempted to lay it out. That just shows how far ahead of you I really am. You then continue to dance as the puppet confined to the strings I command as I watch this unfold. It's actually very comical might I add. Funny you try to claim I'm putting a twist on things when you're the undeniably proven hypocrite as well as a habitual liar/troll/manipulator. Of course you'd try to flip the fact of that in your favor but to no avail you fail once more. Typical for someone backed up against a wall as you are, I almost feel sorry for you man (almost). You're still completely missing the point that you're obviously too feebleminded to grasp (I won't say dimwitted again seeing as how you can't come with your own insults and resort to stealing mine) which is your blantant hypocrisy and double-standard. I don't agree with a lifestyle that you can't even legitimately prove your standpoint on, so that makes me a homophobe in your eyes because you don't agree? You'd then try to solidify this by quoting me using "offensive" slang towards gays that you yourself use in an attempt to make your point seem stronger? Lmfao! Exactly why I pointed out the obvious truth in chat that you're a clown. It's okay for you to believe something that's not even unquestionably proven as well as use derogatory terms which insults a lifestyle you're defending but it's not okay for me to stand by my beliefs and speak a certain way when I actually stand by it? Please bitch, give me a break you're in over your head at this point son. I'm really talking to a wall at this point, although even conversing with dry-wall would be more entertaining than this. The funniest part about it all is you still don't seem to realize how big of a jackass you look like. Or maybe you truly do and are just too embarrassed to admit it, I wouldn't expect it from an egotistical condescending bastard such as yourself.

L(ツ)L

Siikez said:

You live by black and white, that's a sign that you were brought up this way. Call a straight person gay, they're more than likely not going to like that, hence why "gay" and "fag" is used by almost everybody as an insult, not because it's "bad to be gay" but because it's something they're not. Like calling someone a girl, a woman, or a bitch. Not because chicks are "bad" but because that dude doesn't want to be called a woman. I think you probably caught up with me now, if I give you some credit I'll just guess you understand now. But I think we've all seen now how dimwitted and stupid you are so we can expect to see pointless loop holes and twists, in a failed attempt at getting your loose ends to match up. I'm beating a dead horse here, and like you said, you don't like the 5 on 1 argument you got yourself into, so if you manage to find another human with your view point let me know. They have to be under 60 by the way. In all seriousness, I'm glad people like you are becoming thinned out. :D

BottledMindFrame said:

I expected my point to fly completely over your unintelligent mind lol. Let me put this in layman's terms for you once again as I had to in chat since that seems to be the only way you're able to grasp anything above an elementary school level. You along with a couple of others were claiming in chat that by me using words like "fag" (etc.) and by looking down upon their choice to lead that lifestyle that I'm homophobic. Are you still with me here? Try to keep up with this next point that proves how hypocritical you are. It doesn't matter if you're calling somebody who's straight or gay a "fag" (etc.) as an insult for it to imply that those people or types of behavior are perceived as bad, wrong, or shameful to you. Otherwise you wouldn't attempt to use it as an insult in the first place. Yet here you are in chat and in this thread all the sudden now a homosexual activist (lulz) when your history already shows as proven that you have no problem trying to demean other people with slurs that carry a meaning that would essentially define a homophobic in your eyes. Completely hypocritical and actually quite hilarious to me as you are trapped in a corner with nowhere to go at this point. As stated in my last post I expected you to come up with some sort of pathetic defense to undermine your proven hypocritical logic so I'm not surprised at all you'd play it off like I'm calling you homophobic. By your "standards" you're calling yourself homophobic. To say otherwise just proves your double-standard, which you just have.

P.S. LMFA(ツ) @ you jumping at the sight JazzMan cosign (who's an obvious troll and probably Siikez alt account lol)

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by JazzMan on July 6, 2012 at 6:05am

Where did I say "all hip hop fans are against homosexuals" exactly?
 
Vin Detta said:

How ironic, Jazzman is using a stereotype against a stereotype. All of us hip-hop fans must be against homosexuals. You just made one of the most hypocritical statements I've ever seen. Look, if gay people want to get married then so be it. It doesn't effect my life in any way shape or form. I don't know if you, Jazzman, were trying to make a joke about the statement you made (which I hope you were). Because if not, you just made yourself look like a moron.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Vin Detta on July 6, 2012 at 6:07am

Okay, let me rephrase that. You said most fans who are on this page who are white trash that are against homosexuals. There. You feel better now, jackass?

• ▶ Reply

▶ Reply to Discussion

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5
• 6
• …
• 12
• Next ›
• Page