Attention California Drivers
Well this is some bullshit
Calif. Bill Would Allow Video Monitors in Vehicles
The California Assembly has passed a bill that would allow video recorders to be installed on
vehicles' dashboards. State law currently
prohibits dashboard devices that may obstruct a driver's view.
The bill is supported by companies that hire teams of drivers. They want to ensure their employees are driving safely and use the cameras to help determine fault in an accident.
The bill's author, Republican Assemblyman Nathan Fletcher of San Diego, said companies
that use the recorders in other states have reduced their accident
claims.
The devices could record a vehicle's speed, where it travels, whether the driver wore a seatbelt and when the brakes were applied before an accident.
The bill, AB1942, passed the Assembly 49-0 and now moves to the Senate.
Tags: bill, california, car, driver, passed, video
Views: 1
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by ₡₱♛ on -
i dont do anything illegal when driving, been pulled over once. im also tired of people driving like dicks, but this just seems a little over the top. And i dont think it said it would only be in work vehicles, it just says companies support the idea. It would be in all vehicles
J9X said:If you don't do anything illegal while driving then I don't see what the problem is. I'm tired of people driving like dicks.
And it's not really violating our privacy if it is in work vehicles only. If you're on the clock then you're the company's liability.
-
Permalink Reply by Nick James on -
See thats what i thought. I too think its over the top.
Cole said:i dont do anything illegal when driving, been pulled over once. im also tired of people driving like dicks, but this just seems a little over the top. And i dont think it said it would only be in work vehicles, it just says companies support the idea. It would be in all vehicles
J9X said:If you don't do anything illegal while driving then I don't see what the problem is. I'm tired of people driving like dicks.
And it's not really violating our privacy if it is in work vehicles only. If you're on the clock then you're the company's liability.
-
Permalink Reply by J9X on -
Yeah but the ACLU is going to make sure there are stipulations to this. . They think....
The bill should state explicitly that the recorder data
belongs to the vehicle owner.
An employee driver should be given the opportunity to consent
or refuse to consent to the use of the event data recorder in
the vehicle he or she drives.
The vehicle owner should have the ability to disable the video
event recorder and the ability to turn it off and on.
Data collection should be restricted to 30 seconds prior to
and after the event that triggers the video event recorder.
And most of the ones that are in affect already are on a loop until there is either a quick stop or an accident has actually occured
-
Permalink Reply by J9X on
-
do it when the car is off. lol
The Chef said:There goes hotboxing my car. lol.
Shotgun...
-
Permalink Reply by Nick James on
-
Even with stipulations they will find a way around those if they want to. If the recorder belongs to the owner then why are we paying for their law??. If you can refuse then its the same as refusing to take a drug test. Its a fail or in any case you would automatically be at fault if you didn't have the recorder. And if you can turn it off then whats the point of even having it in the car.?? The one thing i do agree with is the 30 second loop.
J9X said:Yeah but the ACLU is going to make sure there are stipulations to this. . They think....
The bill should state explicitly that the recorder data
belongs to the vehicle owner.
An employee driver should be given the opportunity to consent
or refuse to consent to the use of the event data recorder in
the vehicle he or she drives.
The vehicle owner should have the ability to disable the video
event recorder and the ability to turn it off and on.
Data collection should be restricted to 30 seconds prior to
and after the event that triggers the video event recorder.
And most of the ones that are in affect already are on a loop until there is either a quick stop or an accident has actually occured
-
Permalink Reply by J9X on
-
Are they really going to come and put it in every single car in california? I doubt it. If they do I will just go to nevada and buy a car. lol I really don't see this happening anyways.
Nick Laird said:Even with stipulations they will find a way around those if they want to. If the recorder belongs to the owner then why are we paying for their law??. If you can refuse then its the same as refusing to take a drug test. Its a fail or in any case you would automatically be at fault if you didn't have the recorder. And if you can turn it off then whats the point of even having it in the car.?? The one thing i do agree with is the 30 second loop.
J9X said:Yeah but the ACLU is going to make sure there are stipulations to this. . They think....
The bill should state explicitly that the recorder data
belongs to the vehicle owner.
An employee driver should be given the opportunity to consent
or refuse to consent to the use of the event data recorder in
the vehicle he or she drives.
The vehicle owner should have the ability to disable the video
event recorder and the ability to turn it off and on.
Data collection should be restricted to 30 seconds prior to
and after the event that triggers the video event recorder.
And most of the ones that are in affect already are on a loop until there is either a quick stop or an accident has actually occured
-
Permalink Reply by Dukecityspecialist on -
It has nothing to do with obama bruh, the author of the bill was actually a republican dude
Nick Laird said:Thats bullshit because they can get all the info they need from a box that doesn't require a camera. Its another way for Obama to get into our personal lives and make it easier for world war 3. But they really do have a device that records all that info without the camera.
-
Permalink Reply by Nick James on
-
I know. I was just seeing if i could get conspiracy theories going. I have a few that this makes my theories make sense.
Dukecityspecialist said:It has nothing to do with obama bruh, the author of the bill was actually a republican dude
Nick Laird said:Thats bullshit because they can get all the info they need from a box that doesn't require a camera. Its another way for Obama to get into our personal lives and make it easier for world war 3. But they really do have a device that records all that info without the camera.
-
Permalink Reply by Nick James on
-
They already passed it. It did happen. And if they want to enforce it i think they should be responsible for paying for the cameras. But ohwell. I'm not even in Cali. I just don't want that shit to trickle over to Misery.
J9X said:Are they really going to come and put it in every single car in california? I doubt it. If they do I will just go to nevada and buy a car. lol I really don't see this happening anyways.
Nick Laird said:Even with stipulations they will find a way around those if they want to. If the recorder belongs to the owner then why are we paying for their law??. If you can refuse then its the same as refusing to take a drug test. Its a fail or in any case you would automatically be at fault if you didn't have the recorder. And if you can turn it off then whats the point of even having it in the car.?? The one thing i do agree with is the 30 second loop.
J9X said:Yeah but the ACLU is going to make sure there are stipulations to this. . They think....
The bill should state explicitly that the recorder data
belongs to the vehicle owner.
An employee driver should be given the opportunity to consent
or refuse to consent to the use of the event data recorder in
the vehicle he or she drives.
The vehicle owner should have the ability to disable the video
event recorder and the ability to turn it off and on.
Data collection should be restricted to 30 seconds prior to
and after the event that triggers the video event recorder.
And most of the ones that are in affect already are on a loop until there is either a quick stop or an accident has actually occured
-
Permalink Reply by J9X on
-
Eh, that's okay with me. I'll take this with a grain of salt meaning that marijuana is going to be decriminalized in november. roflcopter.
-
Permalink Reply by Nick James on
-
LOL. I wish it would be but am not holding my breath. Lets make some more cool alcohol commercials though so kids will drink and keep telling them that pot will kill them. That shits stupid to me.
J9X said:Eh, that's okay with me. I'll take this with a grain of salt meaning that marijuana is going to be decriminalized in november. roflcopter.
- ‹ Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›
¡MAYDAY! "Believers" Pre-Order Now Available
Rittz "The Life And Times Of Jonny Valiant" Pre-order Now!
Wrekonize "The War Within" Pre-Order Available!
CES Cru “Constant Energy Struggles” Purchase Now!
Kutt Calhoun "Black Gold" Album Now Available!
Brotha Lynch Hung "Mannibalector" Album In Stores Now!
Tech N9ne's Hostile Takeover: The Story Behind The Tour
Prozak "Nocturnal" EP Now Available!
Krizz Kaliko "Neh' Mind" EP Now Available!
Tech N9ne – ‘E.B.A.H.’/'Boiling Point’ Combo EP Now In Stores!
Tech N9ne "Boiling Point" EP Now Available!
Stevie Stone "Momentum" EP Now Available!
Tech N9ne "E.B.A.H." EP Now Available!
Kutt Calhoun "Kelvin" EP Now Available!
Ces Cru "13" EP Now Available!
¡MAYDAY! "Thrift Store Halos" EP Now Available!
Tech N9ne Blog
‘Get Your Ass To Soundset’ – Tech N9ne Heads To Minnesota For Soundset Festival 2013
This weekend, Tech N9ne and Strange Music join some of hip hop’s biggest names in Shakopee, MN for Soundset 2013. The massive music festival, presented by Rhymesayers Ent., brings together fans from all corners hip hop for a day of live performances featuring the likes of Atmosphere, Snoop Dogg, Busta Rhymes, Schoolboy Q, R.A. The [...]Rest In Peace To Founding Doors Member And Music Legend Ray Manzarek
Today the music world lost one of the greatest to ever touch a keyboard. Ray Manzarek, one of the two founding members of The Doors, passed away at the age of 74. It was in July of 1965 that a random encounter between the prodigious keyboardist and Jim Morrison would eventually turn into one [...]Tech N9ne Chops It Up With Fred Durst, Collab In The Works?
Does Tech N9ne have another collab in the works for Something Else? Out on the road for a string of live performances, Tech got the chatter going on Twitter as he confirmed a phone call with Limp Bizkit frontman, Fred Durst. We can only assume it’s for collaborative purposes, but who knows? Fans may recall [...]WATCH: Tech N9ne To Perform At Rock The Bells 2013, Performs At Pre-Party
We are proud to announce that Tech N9ne will be performing at Rock The Bells 2013! After putting in his work at another legendary hip hop festival (Paid Dues), Tech N9ne is ready to take the stage amongst hip hop’s finest once more in a celebration of a music and culture that has brought together [...]FIRST LOOK: Tech N9ne Shoots ‘Dwamn’ Music Video
Tech N9ne is cooking up Something Else with the first visual shot for his highly anticipated next album. Adorned with beautiful women, cars, and a tour bus unlike anyone has ever seen, Tech took to the pavement to perform “Dwamn” from his upcoming album Something Else. The video has yet to be completed but with [...]© 2013 Created by Strange Admin.
